From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: oyvind@dynator.no, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Full NAT forward and source routing - possible without packet marking?
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 19:10:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ef1ff2-4bd7-1f56-c127-e8f30ea05952@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5a4184c-19db-7d36-f247-7e7bfe235e50@dynator.no>
Le 02/07/2017 à 17:58, Øyvind Kaurstad a écrit :
>
> Not sure if this clarified anything
There was no need to clarify anything to me. Your original post was
clear enough, except the reason for the internal SNAT that you explained
but which is irrelevant, as you mentionned. However, hopefully that will
help other readers concentrate on the real issue.
> but it still seems to me I need to leverage the connection tracking
> with packet marking to be able to ensure the reply packets that should
> go back out a non-default route actually does that.
I'm afraid so, unless you can add a second IP address to the target device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 13:55 Full NAT forward and source routing - possible without packet marking? Øyvind Kaurstad
2017-07-01 10:05 ` Pascal Hambourg
2017-07-01 20:26 ` Robert White
2017-07-01 22:17 ` zrm
2017-07-01 23:50 ` Robert White
2017-07-03 18:07 ` Hairpin NAT " zrm
2017-07-04 1:14 ` Robert White
2017-07-04 5:48 ` K
2017-07-04 7:07 ` Neal P. Murphy
2017-07-04 10:21 ` Robert White
2017-07-04 20:53 ` Pascal Hambourg
2017-07-04 21:20 ` Neal P. Murphy
2017-07-05 5:28 ` Robert White
2017-07-08 19:54 ` zrm
2017-07-08 21:55 ` Robert White
2017-07-02 7:29 ` Full NAT forward and source routing " Pascal Hambourg
2017-07-02 10:33 ` Robert White
2017-07-02 11:19 ` Pascal Hambourg
2017-07-02 15:58 ` Øyvind Kaurstad
2017-07-02 17:10 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2017-07-02 23:20 ` Øyvind Kaurstad
2017-07-02 21:10 ` Robert White
2017-07-02 23:09 ` Øyvind Kaurstad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7ef1ff2-4bd7-1f56-c127-e8f30ea05952@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oyvind@dynator.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.