From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bryan O'Donoghue Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:33:19 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] warp7: include: configs: Differentiate bootscript address from loadaddr In-Reply-To: <7c14667f-e9f2-1d3b-f143-4823e7748f44@koncepto.io> References: <20190508181448.20452-1-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> <20190508181448.20452-4-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> <95799955-1e38-1898-fc25-31c8e935f36d@linaro.org> <21c312b9-4302-f2a4-c794-0917ccb30612@linaro.org> <7492802e-1283-aad7-961e-e8f0bbd1bdf1@koncepto.io> <0862aa56-5468-6f0e-141a-6c332b0416fa@linaro.org> <7c14667f-e9f2-1d3b-f143-4823e7748f44@koncepto.io> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 15/05/2019 20:13, Pierre-Jean Texier wrote: > Regarding your question, it seems that is now the standard on many > platforms [2]. > In fact, instead of keeping a custom environment, it is better to use a > more > generic approach by switching to disto config (with boot.scr, extlinux, > and so on). > > For sure, we can customized the CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND variable in patch. Right. This smells like a bigger change to me then, since we have to account for how we transition current users from their u-boot environment to distroboot. It sounds to me like a series of patches around this one topic. So, I think it is worthwhile exploring that set of changes but, I do think we should do it separately to this set :) --- bod