All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, lersek@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com,
	mreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	balaton@eik.bme.hu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/14] sam460ex: Don't size flash memory to match backing image
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:04:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8a862f1-1f1e-818a-2ac6-bd54375c4dc3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307130323.9353-7-armbru@redhat.com>

On 3/7/19 2:03 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Machine "sam460ex" maps its flash memory at address 0xFFF00000.  When
> no image is supplied, its size is 1MiB (0x100000), and 512KiB of ROM
> get mapped on top of its second half.  Else, it's the size of the
> image rounded up to the next multiple of 64KiB.
> 
> The rounding is actually useless: pflash_cfi01_realize() fails with
> "failed to read the initial flash content" unless it's a no-op.
> 
> I have no idea what happens when the pflash's size exceeds 1MiB.
> Useful outcomes seem unlikely.

You now have! [*] "Hardwiring address lines leaves part of the hardware
unaddressable." Anything bigger than 1MiB mapped at 0xFFF00000 only has
the first MiB addressable. IOW anything above 1MiB is unaddressable, but
you still can map a such bigger flash.

[*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg01380.html

> I guess memory at the end of the address space remains unmapped when
> it's smaller than 1MiB.  Again, useful outcomes seem unlikely.
> 
> The physical hardware appears to have 512KiB of flash memory:
> https://eu.mouser.com/datasheet/2/268/atmel_AT49BV040B-1180330.pdf
> 
> For now, just set the flash memory size to 1MiB regardless of image
> size, and document the mess.
> 
> Cc: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/sam460ex.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c b/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> index d455c4bd07..c6258ca1d0 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/sam460ex.c
> @@ -91,32 +91,43 @@ struct boot_info {
>  
>  static int sam460ex_load_uboot(void)
>  {
> +    /*
> +     * This first creates 1MiB of flash memory mapped at the end of
> +     * the 32-bit address space (0xFFF00000..0xFFFFFFFF).
> +     *
> +     * If_PFLASH unit 0 is defined, the flash memory is initialized
> +     * from that block backend.
> +     *
> +     * Else, it's initialized to zero.  And then 512KiB of ROM get
> +     * mapped on top of its second half (0xFFF80000..0xFFFFFFFF),
> +     * initialized from u-boot-sam460-20100605.bin.
> +     *
> +     * This doesn't smell right.
> +     *
> +     * The physical hardware appears to have 512KiB flash memory.
> +     *
> +     * TODO Figure out what we really need here, and clean this up.
> +     */
> +
>      DriveInfo *dinfo;
> -    BlockBackend *blk = NULL;
> -    hwaddr base = FLASH_BASE | ((hwaddr)FLASH_BASE_H << 32);
> -    long bios_size = FLASH_SIZE;
> -    int fl_sectors;
>  
>      dinfo = drive_get(IF_PFLASH, 0, 0);
> -    if (dinfo) {
> -        blk = blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo);
> -        bios_size = blk_getlength(blk);
> -    }
> -    fl_sectors = (bios_size + 65535) >> 16;
> -
> -    if (!pflash_cfi01_register(base, NULL, "sam460ex.flash", bios_size,
> -                               blk, 64 * KiB, fl_sectors,
> +    if (!pflash_cfi01_register(FLASH_BASE | ((hwaddr)FLASH_BASE_H << 32),
> +                               NULL, "sam460ex.flash", FLASH_SIZE,
> +                               dinfo ? blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo) : NULL,
> +                               64 * KiB, FLASH_SIZE / (64 * KiB),
>                                 1, 0x89, 0x18, 0x0000, 0x0, 1)) {
>          error_report("Error registering flash memory");
>          /* XXX: return an error instead? */
>          exit(1);
>      }
>  
> -    if (!blk) {
> +    if (!dinfo) {
>          /*error_report("No flash image given with the 'pflash' parameter,"
>                  " using default u-boot image");*/
> -        base = UBOOT_LOAD_BASE | ((hwaddr)FLASH_BASE_H << 32);
> -        rom_add_file_fixed(UBOOT_FILENAME, base, -1);
> +        rom_add_file_fixed(UBOOT_FILENAME,
> +                           UBOOT_LOAD_BASE | ((hwaddr)FLASH_BASE_H << 32),
> +                           -1);
>      }
>  
>      return 0;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07 13:03 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/14] pflash: Fixes and cleanups Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/14] pflash: Rename pflash_t to PFlashCFI01, PFlashCFI02 Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/14] pflash_cfi01: Do not exit() on guest aborting "write to buffer" Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/14] pflash_cfi01: Log use of flawed " Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/14] pflash: Rename *CFI_PFLASH* to *PFLASH_CFI* Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/14] hw: Use PFLASH_CFI0{1, 2} and TYPE_PFLASH_CFI0{1, 2} Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/14] sam460ex: Don't size flash memory to match backing image Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 14:04   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2019-03-08 14:27     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 14:34       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/14] ppc405_boards: " Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08  0:10   ` David Gibson
2019-03-08  7:24     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 11:09       ` David Gibson
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/14] r2d: Fix flash memory size, sector size, width, device ID Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:51   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/14] hw/mips/malta: Fix the DEBUG_BOARD_INIT code Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/14] hw/mips/malta: Remove fl_sectors variable Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] hw/mips/malta: Restrict 'bios_size' variable scope Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/14] mips_malta: Clean up definition of flash memory size somewhat Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/14] pflash: Clean up after commit 368a354f02b, part 1 Markus Armbruster
2019-03-07 13:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/14] pflash: Clean up after commit 368a354f02b, part 2 Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 14:05   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-03-09 13:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/14] pflash: Fixes and cleanups no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a8a862f1-1f1e-818a-2ac6-bd54375c4dc3@redhat.com \
    --to=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=balaton@eik.bme.hu \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.