From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rahul Bedarkar Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:54:24 +0530 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/cairo: improve license information In-Reply-To: <20170306210218.28867-1-romain.naour@gmail.com> References: <20170306210218.28867-1-romain.naour@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Romain, On Tuesday 07 March 2017 02:32 AM, Romain Naour wrote: > Cairo can be licenced under MPL and license copy are in COPYING-LGPL-2.1 > and COPYING-MPL-1.1. As per COPYING file, this dual licensing only applies to library and other auxiliary components (tests, utils, etc) may be under different licenses. > > Signed-off-by: Romain Naour > --- > package/cairo/cairo.mk | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/cairo/cairo.mk b/package/cairo/cairo.mk > index 761c6f4..137d348 100644 > --- a/package/cairo/cairo.mk > +++ b/package/cairo/cairo.mk > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ > > CAIRO_VERSION = 1.14.8 > CAIRO_SOURCE = cairo-$(CAIRO_VERSION).tar.xz > -CAIRO_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+ > -CAIRO_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > +CAIRO_LICENSE = LGPLv2.1+ or MPL License string for LGPL should be "LGPLv2.1" because license text doesn't have "or (at your option) any later version;" clause. There are many versions of MPL license and COPYING file specifically mentions MPLv1.1 So, license string should be "LGPLv2.1 or MPLv1.1 (library)" Thanks, Rahul