From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C59C433F4 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D692621525 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cantab.net header.i=@cantab.net header.b="vrQh3Hq1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D692621525 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cantab.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388165AbeIUEnJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:43:09 -0400 Received: from mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org ([94.76.243.214]:56098 "EHLO mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725861AbeIUEnJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:43:09 -0400 Received: from mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96C720BDC; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE6120BBB; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:18 +0100 (BST) Authentication-Results: mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=cantab.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cantab.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=dkim; t= 1537484237; bh=adwNq1Sh98igLw7ZBuuQcw+9ySXX+yM9DJhQegBuQFM=; b=v rQh3Hq1ibUH8eZAm957wZtSI8tuja+B7TmGXls+Niv56JEAyh3DJqbX79K1yCz+5 2Td1L4Soa086y0P7h5VEUq/3yoI0bH9J+SpTTEPtAgZZ4OIpj+8a37wSf4lX2b25 SIYswn875wBVOM95gLHnzFH/ByhTX7dD+u0SjMAexCEle+UCV61xtLaFOZt8e+iV 3V9VUIA95ftIVhw5YjE3FeSE6KCJ5lLcE6jdLN857fJSkb1X4gs77Me6rjNGjiPj wBTQVgOnmIOO8olNcFWK9faIEN9oQsypqYrb2i+O0bPdDW07vVAoaCzihshF7r0a uJufLEB2oi/JJfGev9wAQ== X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org Received: from mta.aluminati.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id S2R4u8QB89eg; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc92884-cmbg20-2-0-cust324.5-4.cable.virginm.net [80.1.217.69]) by mta01.prd.rdg.aluminati.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4139162FD9; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:15 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it. To: unconditionedwitness@redchan.it Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20180919081812.020f19e3@lwn.net> <72dadc76-44fe-ecb5-e142-0a9129082c93@cantab.net> <20180920041846.GA4418@1wt.eu> <206423b0a199c1f12e61364d6e687e09@redchan.it> From: Edward Cree Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <206423b0a199c1f12e61364d6e687e09@redchan.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20/09/18 10:27, unconditionedwitness@redchan.it wrote: > Contributors can, at any time, rescind the license grant regarding their > property via written notice to those whom they are rescinding the grant > from (regarding their property (code)). I know others have already said it, but: This is legally nonsense. The only way I can revoke someone's rights to my code under the GPL is if they violate the terms of the GPL. If I were to do so otherwise, then _I_ would be in violation for having distributed derived works of the kernel without a GPL, not to mention the obvious reliance/estoppel problems. Moreover, even if I _could_ revoke the license, I wouldn't want to do so; it would be ridiculously petty in itself and the precedent it would set would be destructive to the entire open-source community, about which I care deeply. It is _because_ Linux and other open-source projects are so important to humanity that I spoke up about what I perceive as a threat to it. In short, "unconditionedwitness", please shut up. You're not helping.