From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sricharan R Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:41:26 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1534248753-2440-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <2ae96741-94c0-ba4c-fc19-05d33179683c@codeaurora.org> <153979105280.5275.841088095583550635@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <20181022153005.GA23950@centauri.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181022153005.GA23950@centauri.lan> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Stephen Boyd , Craig , andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, thierry.escande@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi Niklas, On 10/22/2018 9:00 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:39:03AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12) >>>> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote: >>>>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did. >>>>>> >>>>> Thanks !!. Can i take that as >>>>> Tested-by: Craig Tatlor ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this patch series going to be resent? >>>> >>> >>> Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're >>> good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the >>> registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would >>> appreciate it. >>> >> >> Sorry for the late response. Was away. >> Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq >> driver and fixing the text in documentation. That means, yes its fine to merge >> the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to >> clk change as you mentioned separately. > > Hello Sricharan, > > Great to see that the clk parts has been marged to clk-next! > > Are you also planning on sending out a new version of the cpufreq driver > consolidation parts? > yeah right, will send a new version, sometime next week. > I'm planning on extending your consilidated cpufreq driver with support > for msm8916 (Cortex-A53), where I plan to read PVS/speedbin, in order to > set opp_supported_hw(), and also register with cpufreq (since Viresh/Ulf > suggested that we shouldn't register with cpufreq in the CPR power-domain > driver). ok sure. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sricharan@codeaurora.org (Sricharan R) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:41:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq In-Reply-To: <20181022153005.GA23950@centauri.lan> References: <1534248753-2440-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <2ae96741-94c0-ba4c-fc19-05d33179683c@codeaurora.org> <153979105280.5275.841088095583550635@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <20181022153005.GA23950@centauri.lan> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Niklas, On 10/22/2018 9:00 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:39:03AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12) >>>> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote: >>>>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did. >>>>>> >>>>> Thanks !!. Can i take that as >>>>> Tested-by: Craig Tatlor ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is this patch series going to be resent? >>>> >>> >>> Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're >>> good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the >>> registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would >>> appreciate it. >>> >> >> Sorry for the late response. Was away. >> Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq >> driver and fixing the text in documentation. That means, yes its fine to merge >> the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to >> clk change as you mentioned separately. > > Hello Sricharan, > > Great to see that the clk parts has been marged to clk-next! > > Are you also planning on sending out a new version of the cpufreq driver > consolidation parts? > yeah right, will send a new version, sometime next week. > I'm planning on extending your consilidated cpufreq driver with support > for msm8916 (Cortex-A53), where I plan to read PVS/speedbin, in order to > set opp_supported_hw(), and also register with cpufreq (since Viresh/Ulf > suggested that we shouldn't register with cpufreq in the CPR power-domain > driver). ok sure. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation