From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CD3C072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DC420862 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="t0bM7ab8"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=lohutok.net header.i=@lohutok.net header.b="drYS1+ho" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389449AbfEXPJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:51160 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389115AbfEXPJv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:51 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E6A152140; Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject:to:cc :references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=4PCuKCt3Zz/a FYaXROZTvw517E4=; b=t0bM7ab8ImBaKC/q4aoDHWsKo3V74Lp7HB05G5CdNS/5 WvVVCW7XPNMDOhq8UKnufeIinc+aBFPxNzM2Cvt+6o4OarlDnyDYHxhIPWWFxtRs U8x/1/OAlC6e6QXaTBxQI6a9MPmh+lC+3zClSVTIj1Cu3r0j4vV3VAJhnXIoHFU= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6765E15213F; Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lohutok.net; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=2018-11.pbsmtp; bh=hQwbNWJykq87WUFg2XNLjeQYaVwEzZLkmzKHkNtOEPw=; b=drYS1+hoXsf0S5zzom0UxEPIViPbZ1IpVceiXDkMI7ET87oiWfjM1t5uWrsCaZqZG1Edgd81Jg9sM2KbrmFdAd4pu+9i2ix+YsKBw0qrZeIsUMrKL/mX65ZSrj/TFXWmu0dMmim9VFy/3o/Bpr9akwPv7hzoB4QaPt8i21VVtJc= Received: from [10.0.0.75] (unknown [24.47.52.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBB6D15213E; Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Batch 5 - patch 24/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 124 To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org References: <20190523091437.334232837@linutronix.de> <20190523091651.596776854@linutronix.de> <7e67dcba-525e-993d-5c3d-0f902022f270@lohutok.net> From: Allison Randal Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 11:09:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F9B1202C-7E35-11E9-9634-46F8B7964D18-44123303!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org On 5/24/19 8:33 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That above 'as is' add-on to the short disclaimer looks innocent enough for > me, but then IANAL :) Nod, I think quite a few of these variants we'll ultimately decide can be removed because they are the same terms as the standard GPL disclaimer, even though the wording is slightly different. But, I also completely agree it's better to collect them all together, and then review them as a set, rather than making calls individually on-the-fly as we go. Allison