I'm confident that the below regression is not a regression that resulted from the code change of this series.
The changes i made removes debug messages that are only executed at the GuC-ADS preparation time
and is never being executed at runtime. Also, the code changes had nothing to do with power management
or any locking.

...alan


On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 05:25 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series: Remove unnecessary GuC err capture noise
URL:    https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/103709/
State:  failure
Details:        https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_103709v1/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11620 -> Patchwork_103709v1
Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_103709v1 absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_103709v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_103709v1/index.html

Participating hosts (47 -> 34)

Missing (13): bat-adls-5 bat-dg1-6 bat-dg1-5 bat-dg2-8 bat-dg2-9 fi-bsw-cyan bat-adlp-6 fi-kbl-guc bat-adln-1 bat-rpls-1 bat-rpls-2 bat-jsl-2 bat-jsl-1

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_103709v1:

IGT changes
Possible regressions

  *   igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm:
     *   fi-bdw-gvtdvm: NOTRUN -> DMESG-FAIL<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_103709v1/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html>