From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA23C433E1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CA820738 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 08:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rhgsM9iU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726342AbgFBI7x (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:59:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726110AbgFBI7w (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:59:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3B9C061A0E for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 01:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id m21so9409439eds.13 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3H7xUAxDIV492pf+xpLGSX23/17GnpDs0cq3NBGktLM=; b=rhgsM9iUAuh9JU1+ADlPV/IhOgbmy1ylfxitvFBlq987YnbyFO+CC98BD5g+fMxeTJ rr1zQT0K5MxkqbWNtDSydlH3xQyJWWJq9qJ75KesZxnCdP6HKvi5e3XCYR3xrV3mKI0M bnOP43YOoOYMEWh1AzhASUolMDLPyYjvRKLcu8oWo1UrU1j10OQEghsHI6PzVkYJcbev w4fV+1OpIhp+PdbBg06Qh9jE3/keJn2djpt8D6ujIIX2Ez0b53YD6yuH49sf24w+6Lk7 yee1ADJCQlN+1ra6cvLzrVZ0imASeuY7bVn6H7jVkzS+Hq5CAsWtMgPXwh2JAoniZO+s 2YWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3H7xUAxDIV492pf+xpLGSX23/17GnpDs0cq3NBGktLM=; b=oWefjEFpODj1FxO6ALXwbfXUgdzddOKaKvuDEb10aiTvdet6tx8znZMh7x4JwL/5WW 5Oj5rWenE0HBnn+3iINE/gj0+t4mlWCq5T1T0hKZzlql5zT12yK9AN2vnuaI6Y8r7vGn tZ+I6JXXfm1oWWsj8RSg29jo47bkKf2MWBUlFveVSB8R/I7Vkr+TKK8NHUsTDxg3xbDD jpKJESYW0Bv1oh15FO6TW/TO5oFNVz01xcaJGsUtJiYPCSMkgYNPOwJNbQS5brzFG9ux UUgVVA6TOTxyHGzohI4r2Wok15QvMjgDVPVRwyQLS1bjhwuIRIOT+m2As0ZWh9YMSdjC c8bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MjLYEAwL3d+XZ0Wy5IWknv3bN6vHcfGYUQX5Sq2aRiysD6O02 eQFBoXyoo5LjrxOxtE8xsRQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2NTksfyGytSlAr7jnghHLiOJQmPA8RgLMrtA2/H0poqMIJPzAz7P+wn+rfYKXR8h+wyT0YA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb8d:: with SMTP id r13mr24946658edt.12.1591088390713; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-laptop.micron.com ([165.225.203.62]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b16sm1222984edu.89.2020.06.02.01.59.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block From: Bean Huo To: Boris Brezillon Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, derosier@gmail.com, Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bean Huo Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:59:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com> References: <20200525121814.31934-1-huobean@gmail.com> <829d76189beff5a50ddc56123d22bff3aa6a3378.camel@gmail.com> <0a4fc94213ca5c2040796a66942f626587483721.camel@gmail.com> <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 09:48 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Bean, > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:10:43 +0200 > Bean Huo wrote: > > > Hi Richard > > would you please help us confirm below question?? > > Miquel suggested an approach that would allow us to deal with both > JFFS2 > and UBI/UBIFS without having any FS/wear-leveling specific code at > the > NAND level, but you decided to ignore his comments. Sorry but there's > nothing we can do to help you if you don't listen to our > recommendations. Expose this issue to FS layer, it is not good idea. that will impact more code, and involve duplicated code. > > I've been quite disappointed by your behavior in the past, and it > continues. Recently you've taken Miquel's patches and claimed > ownership did you seem my recent patch? you can ignore that see this. > on them (probably not intentionally, but still) while you were > clearly > unable to rework your original series the way I suggested (which > Miquel > did after seeing you would never send new versions). seriously? > And when Miquel > suggested a change to the implementation he had done based on the > discussion we had with Richard, you decided to ignore it and pursue > in > the original direction. So, quite frankly, I'm really not convinced > you > can conduct such a change. > As Miquel mentioned, we need richard's final comfirmation, If he agrees with this proposal, I give up my current patch. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36431C433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025AB20734 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="enkpaeEc"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rhgsM9iU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 025AB20734 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=W7UF9y/cFpI1i6WQaou2xFZIlUZfzETmVwWKugDHVaQ=; b=enkpaeEcNmaY6a c+kjiWriBL575gxKoGn8TKyXXcT7wrC2XqALgwaBIpILQIpvsqQ/okTr9ptBbbQ62zus92akCknJM O0NaM7PGSdXubzHPiYuiyFxE/SYFh0unFuSgM83L86e1qeiShpHrtcDmRNUtoSaZ2CePOL3DKxYWq 0dg6RafQFx9QfaGVWDtuYI0VgaMD9+hE7uwisRUl3dzc0B8eG2REhO8HNTucc+oE9DlCpj9YHzjPw SoSiYj0hnS4SVPpKUCyig5DuuQUflYSdyt4iTJ9tCozC6x/BiuWHObgEAYGSCta2Pt3JmNGYlDu8z ww0KVd4gp6z9MEKUTqNA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jg2m2-00044G-TO; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 08:59:54 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jg2m1-00043q-4I for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 08:59:54 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id k8so9461778edq.4 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3H7xUAxDIV492pf+xpLGSX23/17GnpDs0cq3NBGktLM=; b=rhgsM9iUAuh9JU1+ADlPV/IhOgbmy1ylfxitvFBlq987YnbyFO+CC98BD5g+fMxeTJ rr1zQT0K5MxkqbWNtDSydlH3xQyJWWJq9qJ75KesZxnCdP6HKvi5e3XCYR3xrV3mKI0M bnOP43YOoOYMEWh1AzhASUolMDLPyYjvRKLcu8oWo1UrU1j10OQEghsHI6PzVkYJcbev w4fV+1OpIhp+PdbBg06Qh9jE3/keJn2djpt8D6ujIIX2Ez0b53YD6yuH49sf24w+6Lk7 yee1ADJCQlN+1ra6cvLzrVZ0imASeuY7bVn6H7jVkzS+Hq5CAsWtMgPXwh2JAoniZO+s 2YWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3H7xUAxDIV492pf+xpLGSX23/17GnpDs0cq3NBGktLM=; b=U9OjuIfr9v4BgCV/B44cBodG5WfXj2JKjJYikQuDXI5Ldyow19R2F8AMX7wncbiv8E gMWsSWOPqSwpRNQKhROFBphwU1tYiIZ8hQPBhwbL+95x3UtQsqODLnpwVoj49k+h7xBJ DUD5sU34keMA0deA/f2tsO9noZMZkLY7KlBKHYEW4WjQpOTkQtDZUiV+oQeIeytA+0oU UOBKPkImsfxW1n3LLS46yx9EyEbUs2qd31GHN2NqTrICuvwR8CmL8LyM9xvOQMBkqkiD 3+uq5SkhIPtYWaa32lQygyGR10oYyMM1DI6nGb/QYywGbKoadgb2npKmTEL4bny+wZrm RHDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533A3gup8rdPGZWE2ibe28w5XIaL4P0xSigj6P+x1C7rgO9tRn1+ szyZ8ZwV4iXk+z+YdcOOHrA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2NTksfyGytSlAr7jnghHLiOJQmPA8RgLMrtA2/H0poqMIJPzAz7P+wn+rfYKXR8h+wyT0YA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb8d:: with SMTP id r13mr24946658edt.12.1591088390713; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-laptop.micron.com ([165.225.203.62]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b16sm1222984edu.89.2020.06.02.01.59.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 01:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block From: Bean Huo To: Boris Brezillon Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:59:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com> References: <20200525121814.31934-1-huobean@gmail.com> <829d76189beff5a50ddc56123d22bff3aa6a3378.camel@gmail.com> <0a4fc94213ca5c2040796a66942f626587483721.camel@gmail.com> <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200602_015953_185554_ABCF7F6F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, Richard Weinberger , s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, derosier@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, Bean Huo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 09:48 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Bean, > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:10:43 +0200 > Bean Huo wrote: > > > Hi Richard > > would you please help us confirm below question?? > > Miquel suggested an approach that would allow us to deal with both > JFFS2 > and UBI/UBIFS without having any FS/wear-leveling specific code at > the > NAND level, but you decided to ignore his comments. Sorry but there's > nothing we can do to help you if you don't listen to our > recommendations. Expose this issue to FS layer, it is not good idea. that will impact more code, and involve duplicated code. > > I've been quite disappointed by your behavior in the past, and it > continues. Recently you've taken Miquel's patches and claimed > ownership did you seem my recent patch? you can ignore that see this. > on them (probably not intentionally, but still) while you were > clearly > unable to rework your original series the way I suggested (which > Miquel > did after seeing you would never send new versions). seriously? > And when Miquel > suggested a change to the implementation he had done based on the > discussion we had with Richard, you decided to ignore it and pursue > in > the original direction. So, quite frankly, I'm really not convinced > you > can conduct such a change. > As Miquel mentioned, we need richard's final comfirmation, If he agrees with this proposal, I give up my current patch. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/