All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: kui.wen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 6/8] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:09:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aacea301-9bed-424e-42a7-c398bf242b1d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157866471921.10140.2303070485485258716@skylake-alporthouse-com>


On 10/01/2020 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-01-10 13:30:47)
>> +static ssize_t
>> +show_client_busy(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +       struct i915_engine_busy_attribute *i915_attr =
>> +               container_of(attr, typeof(*i915_attr), attr);
>> +       struct list_head *list = &i915_attr->client->ctx_list;
>> +       unsigned int engine_class = i915_attr->engine_class;
>> +       struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
>> +       u64 total = 0;
>> +
>> +       if (i915_attr->no_busy_stats)
>> +               return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu(ctx, list, client_link)
>> +               total += sw_busy_add(ctx, engine_class);
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> +       return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", total);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char *uabi_class_names[] = {
>> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER] = "0",
>> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY] = "1",
>> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO] = "2",
>> +       [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE] = "3",
>> +};
> 
> Hmm. /sys/class/drm/card0/clients/0/busy/0
> 
> Ok. I was worried this was 0/0 and so very bland and liable to clash
> later.
> 
>> +
>>   int
>>   __i915_drm_client_register(struct i915_drm_client *client,
>>                             struct task_struct *task)
>>   {
>>          struct i915_drm_clients *clients = client->clients;
>> +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
>> +               container_of(clients, typeof(*i915), clients);
>> +       struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
>>          struct device_attribute *attr;
>> -       int ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +       int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
>>          char idstr[32];
>>   
>>          if (!clients->root)
>> @@ -77,10 +130,71 @@ __i915_drm_client_register(struct i915_drm_client *client,
>>          if (ret)
>>                  goto err_attr;
>>   
>> +       if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(i915)) {
>> +               client->busy_root =
>> +                       kobject_create_and_add("busy", client->root);
>> +               if (!client->busy_root)
>> +                       goto err_attr;
>> +
>> +               for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(uabi_class_names); i++) {
>> +                       struct i915_engine_busy_attribute *i915_attr =
>> +                               &client->attr.busy[i];
> 
> 
> if (!intel_engine_lookup_user(i915, i, 0))
> 	continue;
> 
> i.e. skip if we don't have any engines of that class in the system.

Yes, thanks.

>> +
>> +                       i915_attr->client = client;
>> +                       i915_attr->engine_class = i;
>> +
>> +                       attr = &i915_attr->attr;
>> +
>> +                       sysfs_attr_init(&attr->attr);
>> +
>> +                       attr->attr.name = uabi_class_names[i];
>> +                       attr->attr.mode = 0444;
>> +                       attr->show = show_client_busy;
>> +
>> +                       ret = sysfs_create_file(client->busy_root,
>> +                                               (struct attribute *)attr);
>> +                       if (ret)
>> +                               goto err_busy;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               /* Enable busy stats on all engines. */
>> +               i = 0;
>> +               for_each_uabi_engine(engine, i915) {
>> +                       ret = intel_enable_engine_stats(engine);
> 
> Hmm. We gave it a global bit in
> 
> 	i915->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED.
> 
> That'll avoid having to do the individual checking and rollback.

I could add a top level check as a short circuit, but I prefer to check 
return code from intel_enable_engine_stats since it returns one.

Also if new GuC will have I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_ENABLED it will still fail 
to enable engine stats and then fallback to pphwsp has to happen.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-10 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-10 13:30 [Intel-gfx] [RFC 0/8] Per client engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 1/8] drm/i915: Expose list of clients in sysfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:36   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 2/8] drm/i915: Update client name on context create Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:39   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/8] drm/i915: Track per-context engine busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:46   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 4/8] drm/i915: Track all user contexts per client Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 5/8] drm/i915: Contexts can use struct pid stored in the client Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:42   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-30 16:11     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 6/8] drm/i915: Expose per-engine client busyness Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 13:58   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 14:09     ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2020-01-10 14:12       ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 7/8] drm/i915: Track hw reported context runtime Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 14:03   ` Chris Wilson
2020-01-10 13:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC 8/8] drm/i915: Fallback to hw context runtime when sw tracking is not available Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-01-10 16:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per client engine busyness (rev3) Patchwork
2020-01-10 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-14  4:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aacea301-9bed-424e-42a7-c398bf242b1d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=kui.wen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.