On 4/27/2018 7:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:44:53PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote: >> From: Ankit Nautiyal >> >> If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a >> modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given >> user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from >> kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not be given, if aspect-ratio >> is not supported by the user. >> >> This patch: >> 1. rejects the modes with aspect-ratio info, during modeset, if the >> user does not support aspect ratio. >> 2. does not load the aspect-ratio info in user-mode structure, if >> aspect ratio is not supported. >> 3. adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is expected >> in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio, if its >> not expected. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal >> >> V3: Addressed review comments from Ville: >> Do not corrupt the current crtc state by updating aspect-ratio on >> the fly. >> V4: rebase >> V5: As suggested by Ville, rejected the modeset calls for modes with >> aspect ratio, if the user does not set aspect-ratio cap. >> V6: Used the helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is >> expected in the user-mode. >> V7: rebase >> V8: rebase >> V9: rebase >> v10: Modified the commit-message >> v11: rebase >> v12: Merged the patch for adding aspect-ratio helper functions >> with this patch. >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 8 ++++++++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/drm/drm_modes.h | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c >> index a231dd5..98323f4 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c >> @@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ int drm_mode_getcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, >> crtc_resp->mode_valid = 0; >> } >> } >> + drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(file_priv, &crtc_resp->mode); >> drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -628,6 +629,13 @@ int drm_mode_setcrtc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, >> ret = -ENOMEM; >> goto out; >> } >> + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, >> + &crtc_req->mode)) { >> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unexpected aspect-ratio flag bits\n"); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto out; >> + } >> + >> >> ret = drm_mode_convert_umode(dev, mode, &crtc_req->mode); >> if (ret) { >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c >> index c395a24..d6f68c8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c >> @@ -1759,3 +1759,48 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display, >> drm_mode_is_420_also(display, mode); >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_is_420); >> + >> +/** >> + * drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed - checks if the aspect-ratio information >> + * is expected from the user-mode. >> + * >> + * If the user has set aspect-ratio cap, then the flag of the user-mode is >> + * allowed to contain aspect-ratio value. >> + * If the user does not set aspect-ratio cap, then the only value allowed in the >> + * flags bits is aspect-ratio NONE. >> + * >> + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities >> + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flag carry the aspect ratio >> + * information. >> + * >> + * Returns: >> + * true if the aspect-ratio info is allowed in the user-mode flags. >> + * false, otherwise. >> + */ >> +bool >> +drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv, >> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode) >> +{ >> + return file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed || (umode->flags & >> + DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) == DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE; > Still looks funny. Alright. Let me change it to: if (file_priv->aspect_ratio_allowed || (umode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK) == DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_NONE) return true; return false; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags - filters the aspect-ratio bits in the >> + * user-mode flags. >> + * >> + * Checks if the aspect-ratio information is allowed. Resets the aspect-ratio >> + * bits in the user-mode flags, if aspect-ratio info is not allowed. >> + * >> + * @file_priv: file private structure to get the user capabilities. >> + * @umode: drm_mode_modeinfo struct, whose flags' aspect-ratio bits needs to >> + * be filtered. >> + * >> + */ >> +void >> +drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv, >> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode) >> +{ >> + if (!drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(file_priv, umode)) >> + umode->flags &= ~DRM_MODE_FLAG_PIC_AR_MASK; >> +} >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_modes.h b/include/drm/drm_modes.h >> index 2f78b7e..e0b060d 100644 >> --- a/include/drm/drm_modes.h >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_modes.h >> @@ -461,6 +461,10 @@ bool drm_mode_is_420_also(const struct drm_display_info *display, >> const struct drm_display_mode *mode); >> bool drm_mode_is_420(const struct drm_display_info *display, >> const struct drm_display_mode *mode); >> +bool drm_mode_aspect_ratio_allowed(const struct drm_file *file_priv, >> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode); >> +void drm_mode_filter_aspect_ratio_flags(const struct drm_file *file_priv, >> + struct drm_mode_modeinfo *umode); > Since these are no longer exported the prototypes should go into > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h Got it, will move the prototypes to the correct place. Thanks for pointing that out. Regards, Ankit > >> struct drm_display_mode *drm_cvt_mode(struct drm_device *dev, >> int hdisplay, int vdisplay, int vrefresh, >> -- >> 2.7.4 > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel