From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F69C4338F for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB6E60EFF for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238006AbhHDMOh (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:14:37 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:36526 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236350AbhHDMOg (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:14:36 -0400 Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B120221F5; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:14:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1628079263; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D5B+43VdvWYmHPc+aHhOHSoSNPB1WrgbUZsiW5Y9uO8=; b=pY2uN4RA8lAod4hzjmKX+xok+aUaUwIEQ6tDIDshn/w0eN3lZ9NKo1KKw1wG3PB679ghv/ Dt7627cr8srQ61lp8Md9bDLlxwplFH7MVh21fWnADoDKFnJzNcl+C4h4IqPnwd9FS7dne9 xvirYv/1qo32BytLeEQHRQwhmAPiXjw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1628079263; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D5B+43VdvWYmHPc+aHhOHSoSNPB1WrgbUZsiW5Y9uO8=; b=ot16R5nMPdWTgdOBYJGwdJh6OdZLKmuGXPv6OfKCp9isD2MikOn9S6Z6kWHBXpBCwimLHA EeoJOF2f49Yuy4Bg== Received: from imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC5713672; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap1.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id a5i+Cp+ECmECJgAAGKfGzw (envelope-from ); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:14:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] SLUB: reduce irq disabled scope and make it RT compatible To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Mike Galbraith , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jann Horn References: <20210729132132.19691-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20210804120522.GD6464@techsingularity.net> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:14:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210804120522.GD6464@techsingularity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/4/21 2:05 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:20:57PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Series is based on 5.14-rc3 and also available as a git branch: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slub-local-lock-v3r1 >> > > FWIW, I ran a corrected version of this series through a few tests. Some > small gains, no major regressions in terms of performance on a !PREEMPT_RT > configuration across 6 different machines. Thanks a lot, Mel!