All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: "ohad@wizery.com" <ohad@wizery.com>,
	"peng.fan@nxp.com" <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@st.com>,
	"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state machine
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:20:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abbe9f2c-11db-3b53-fa21-115c18c40d8f@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e89d9859f4324cf59b0ae6787775d8f5@SFHDAG7NODE2.st.com>

Hi Mathieu,

On 3/27/20 8:47 AM, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> Sent: mardi 24 mars 2020 22:46
>> To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
>> Cc: ohad@wizery.com; Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>; s-
>> anna@ti.com; peng.fan@nxp.com; Arnaud POULIQUEN
>> <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>; Fabien DESSENNE
>> <fabien.dessenne@st.com>; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state
>> machine
>>
>> This patch allocates a synchronisation state machine, either provided or
>> not by users, in order to enact the proper behavior requested by the
>> platform or specific scenarios.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 59
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index 02dbb826aa29..1578a9c70422 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -1955,6 +1955,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>>  	kfree(rproc->firmware);
>>  	kfree(rproc->ops);
>>  	kfree(rproc->sync_ops);
>> +	kfree(rproc->sync_states);
>>  	kfree(rproc);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -2035,6 +2036,59 @@ static int rproc_alloc_sync_ops(struct rproc *rproc,
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int rproc_alloc_sync_states(struct rproc *rproc,
>> +				   const struct rproc_ops *boot_ops,
>> +				   const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops,
>> +				   struct rproc_sync_states *sync_states)
>> +{
>> +	struct rproc_sync_states *st;
>> +
>> +	/* At least one set of operation is needed */
>> +	if (!boot_ops && !sync_ops)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* We have a synchronisation state machine, no need to build one */
>> +	if (sync_states) {
>> +		st = kmemdup(sync_states, sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!st)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
> 
> I think a check between sync_states and boot_ops/sync_ops may be needed here
> even if it is platform driver responsibility to provide coherent configuration
> As soon as one of the sync_states is set at true, sync_ops must be provided
> As soon as one of the sync_states is set at false, boot_ops must be provided
> 
> Regards,
> Loic
> 
>> +		/* Nothing else to do */
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Allocate synchronisation state machine */
>> +	st = kzalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);

Hmm, do you really want to allocate these dynamically? You are
allocating/initializing these no matter what, and I see these as no
different from the likes of has_iommu or auto_boot. Why not just add the
struct as a regular member instead of a pointer?

>> +	if (!st)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We have a boot_ops and no sync_ops - build a state machine that
>> +	 * does _not_ synchronise with an MCU.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (boot_ops && !sync_ops) {
>> +		st->on_init = st->after_stop = st->after_crash = false;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We have a sync_ops and an no boot_ops - build a state machine
>> that
>> +	 * _only_ synchronises with an MCU.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (sync_ops && !boot_ops) {
>> +		st->on_init = st->after_stop = st->after_crash = true;
>> +		goto out;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	rproc->sync_with_mcu = st->on_init;

This is not needed because of the rproc_set_mcu_sync_state call below.

regards
Suman

>> +	/* And the synchronisation state machine to use */
>> +	rproc->sync_states = st;
>> +	/* Tell the core what to do when initialising */
>> +	rproc_set_mcu_sync_state(rproc, RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int rproc_alloc_internals(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name,
>>  				 const struct rproc_ops *boot_ops,
>>  				 const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops,
>> @@ -2065,7 +2119,10 @@ static int rproc_alloc_internals(struct rproc *rproc,
>> const char *name,
>>  			return ret;
>>  	}
>>
>> -	return 0;
>> +	/* Finally allocate the synchronisation state machine */
>> +	ret = rproc_alloc_sync_states(rproc, boot_ops, sync_ops,
>> sync_states);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> --
>> 2.20.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-30 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 21:45 [PATCH v2 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for synchronisation with MCU Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] remoteproc: Add new operation and state machine for MCU synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 22:46   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 22:49     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:53       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 21:38         ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 21:38           ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_set_mcu_sync_state() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 22:55   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 11:05   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 19:47     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:58       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops " Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 19:54   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] remoteproc: Get rid of tedious error path Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 20:31   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_alloc_internals() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 11:10   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 20:38     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:29       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 21:53         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 23:07     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_alloc_state_machine() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:12   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:10     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:41       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 18:35         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 23:13     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state machine Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:47   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:16     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 23:20     ` Suman Anna [this message]
2020-04-01 20:46       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] remoteproc: Call the right core function based on synchronisation state Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 15:10   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-02 20:16     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 18:48       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 18:48         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] remoteproc: Decouple firmware load and remoteproc booting Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:27   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] remoteproc: Repurpose function rproc_trigger_auto_boot() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:32   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_fw_boot() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:42   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] remoteproc: Introducting new functions to start and stop an MCU Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 18:08   ` Suman Anna
2020-03-31 21:46     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:55       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_trigger_recovery() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:52   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-02 20:35     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 19:02       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 19:02         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] remoteproc: Correctly deal with MCU synchronisation when changing FW image Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:50   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:21     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 22:14       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:55         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-22 21:29         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-22 22:56           ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] remoteproc: Correctly deal with MCU synchronisation when changing state Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 14:04   ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:49     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 22:35       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:29         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 20:55           ` Suman Anna
2020-04-02 20:42         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 20:40           ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] remoteproc: Make MCU synchronisation state changes on stop and crashed Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for synchronisation with MCU Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-31 22:51   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:39     ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abbe9f2c-11db-3b53-fa21-115c18c40d8f@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=fabien.dessenne@st.com \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.