On 2017-09-25 17:49, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> I have a patch on list, which adds hbitmap_next_zero function, it may help
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg00809.html

Hmmm.  Sounds good, but (1) I would need to directly access the bitmap
instead of the iterator, and (2) I would still need to clear the whole
in the iterator...

It does sound tempting because I could drop the previous patch, then
(and thus wouldn't have to worry about concurrent resetting), but I
don't think the whole implementation would be simpler.

I'll think about it, but thanks for pointing it out in any case!

Max