From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B0CC33CA2 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675A72077B for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 12:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730820AbgAIMIE (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 07:08:04 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:58130 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728653AbgAIMIC (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 07:08:02 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CE331B; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 04:08:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 955663F534; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 04:08:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: warn if NUMA configurations conflicts with lower layer To: Morten Rasmussen Cc: "Zengtao (B)" , Valentin Schneider , Sudeep Holla , Linuxarm , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340AE1D3@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <20200102112955.GC4864@bogus> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340AEB67@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340AFCA0@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <7b375d79-2d3c-422b-27a6-68972fbcbeaf@arm.com> <66943c82-2cfd-351b-7f36-5aefdb196a03@arm.com> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340B3203@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <51a7d543-e35f-6492-fa51-02828832c154@arm.com> <20200109110514.GC10914@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:07:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200109110514.GC10914@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/01/2020 12:05, Morten Rasmussen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:31:24PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> Your issue is related to the 'numa mask check for scheduler MC >> selection' functionality. It was introduced by commit 37c3ec2d810f and >> re-introduced by commit e67ecf647020 later. I don't know why we need >> this functionality? > > That functionality is to ensure that we don't break the sched_domain > hierarchy for numa-in-cluster systems. We have to be sure that the MC > domain is always smaller or equal to the NUMA node span. Thanks! And we already have Arm64 systems today using 'numa-in-cluster', as I learned yesterday.