From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [kernelci-members] Working with the KernelCI project References: <20200707222342.scrz75265etaqlmd@redhat.com> <8d422dcf-d4ef-8e74-be82-f52272d9a966@redhat.com> <863511a8-090a-6ee1-ddce-f32d70458ee8@redhat.com> <1ff4a09c-4529-017c-5b0b-43712575771b@redhat.com> <16397F50C12D08DD.21243@groups.io> <521cc33e-62fc-55c1-aeb2-682007243d97@redhat.com> From: "Nikolai Kondrashov" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:49:09 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: To: kernelci@groups.io, dvyukov@google.com, Nikolai Kondrashov Cc: Guillaume Tucker , Philip Li , kernelci-members@groups.io, nkondras@redhat.com, Don Zickus , syzkaller , =?UTF-8?Q?I=c3=b1aki_Malerba?= On 10/1/20 5:48 PM, Dmitry Vyukov via groups.io wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 3:32 PM Nikolai Kondrashov > wrote: >> >> On 10/1/20 1:48 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: >> > Here are the things which could be improved: >> >> Oh, and another thing: could you avoid re-sending the identical >> revisions/builds you've already sent? I.e. send them only once, unless you >> have fields to add? Each of those costs us a row in the database, which is not >> a big deal, but would be good to avoid. > > Do you see that we send dups? I've added logic to not send dups and > from what I see it's working. Please find attached a zip archive with seven submissions from about six hours ago. Each has revisions with the same id and git_commit_hash. Some of those revisions have different discovery_time, and that alone shouldn't really be the reason to resend. Each of those submissions have a build object, but some of them are repeated. Revision with that git_commit_hash was submitted at least 72 times. Nick