From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.220.167] (helo=mail-fx0-f167.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lhhb0-0005X5-Uf for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:52:58 +0100 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so300472fxm.12 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:52:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iZduZSuerOkWsiWM49+jIRmwbKRBIKYq3uQCc/xYfAo=; b=sePAWyfxrVXe3ZhsnKb152M6E72SC+hYtyrzHKwtp66Ia9/ojhhRJwoIwalP/1ZwcK naLPNpC3DHVVDKZ6Cbm3h6cuHYSOZrkHQh24EiwQnnagU+2r5xEmT/6gcAIgya0Rscch gAUlo1KbsHeiXkY97PqZiBk4bjZGoIsOexwq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=VSvqWvJxin3Q3RRDeNxtl2rhQOt6B9+wROzLvjttzlbUnspQnhcQ33Se/GkFqx3UGg bKtHAxaldXbvbZaQK0aVMrAKNPPrJ/3HxD90uzUNTPsNymfEe+B1RV2A/R6qj7ag/eW+ MCXggC8NE/ZtVtSQ8I86H2irNVVKGDuE0Q0I0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.105.9 with SMTP id r9mr7146290fao.66.1236851565071; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: g++ lib problem X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:52:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I was trying to port a program that used asinl etc. but apparently asinl is not in our env. However if I look at ~/oe/tmp/staging/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/c++/cmath I see around line 123 inline long double asin(long double __x) { return __builtin_asinl(__x); } questions: shouldn't this have been a double asin? (probably not too important as the result will be casted) and if asin is long double, then why is there no asinl? normally it is double asin(double x); long double asinl(long double x); guess this is something in the way our libs are generated, but I could not find the proper way to fix it. Anyone a suggestion? Frans.