From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu0vf-00038S-87 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:01:45 +0100 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so1696643gxk.7 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=diO3u0IGHaSHZjvBKLGNRfLulZ5RmZrELM1h3C14KxY=; b=xBeCXavsoU5TJXN3gZDXwWL5g5BYHN53XOZCpDrCOR9Fncrtg13JLghwj/z5uCcGQK c1xHsALiWoeMnsf1pZKD3BDBJ5fq98SUavlaOOch+5A0D75BMljJCR3pCYz734b7lEBY fC2kmTjuTv4U9oc5nuOgdO0Le2AK3ju9tpXPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ggv70R4vXGEup7TOyE67T3uj1MJ/3Z/i8TUuIGd5ZJsIlJRikdQjuOqW5HnAKUtbNE AN81FbBZiHrpGv84fixT0+t7y+Ro1JdITK6njVe0iCEvpwdaJxP2/RhBzWgbth+94ort zBKw04OVSsaetYvX8tXlJlXARPViWhhwG9VkM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.59.16 with SMTP id m16mr4559723ank.84.1269338312151; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201003231050.56580.holger+oe@freyther.de> References: <201003231050.56580.holger+oe@freyther.de> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:58:31 +0100 Message-ID: From: Frans Meulenbroeks To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.224 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: BBVERSIONS X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:01:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/3/23 Holger Hans Peter Freyther : > On Tuesday 23 March 2010 10:32:59 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> Chris, while this is a nice idea it conflicts with having checksums in >> the recipe, as that makes the recipes unique. >> Unless of course there is (or we create) a way to have multiple >> checksums in a recipe and pick the one that is for the version we are >> building. > > > There is a way or could be a way. For the name= we can use a variable in the > name (e.g. PV) but have a written out variant for the SRC_URI. That would be cool and also nice to have for current recipes. When moving a recipe to a new dir you cannot just clip whatever is generated and paste it into the recipe (especially if the SRC_URI is in a .inc) You either need to change the SRC_URI or the generated checksum name.