From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D128C4740C for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35977206CD for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 35977206CD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7KUG-0002pp-6X for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:17:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7KSD-0001ml-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:15:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7KSC-0000em-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:15:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7KS9-0000cw-RA; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 10:15:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC83C04FFE0; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dresden.str.redhat.com (ovpn-116-179.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.179]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971A76061E; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:15:01 +0000 (UTC) To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" References: <20190830161228.54238-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20190830161228.54238-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <75066c81-04f5-b849-51a8-c663fea5b60b@redhat.com> <19a3e738-795f-50a8-27a1-548c9ec5fbdc@virtuozzo.com> From: Max Reitz Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=mreitz@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFXOJlcBCADEyyhOTsoa/2ujoTRAJj4MKA21dkxxELVj3cuILpLTmtachWj7QW+TVG8U /PsMCFbpwsQR7oEy8eHHZwuGQsNpEtNC2G/L8Yka0BIBzv7dEgrPzIu+W3anZXQW4702+uES U29G8TP/NGfXRRHGlbBIH9KNUnOSUD2vRtpOLXkWsV5CN6vQFYgQfFvmp5ZpPeUe6xNplu8V mcTw8OSEDW/ZnxJc8TekCKZSpdzYoxfzjm7xGmZqB18VFwgJZlIibt1HE0EB4w5GsD7x5ekh awIe3RwoZgZDLQMdOitJ1tUc8aqaxvgA4tz6J6st8D8pS//m1gAoYJWGwwIVj1DjTYLtABEB AAG0HU1heCBSZWl0eiA8bXJlaXR6QHJlZGhhdC5jb20+iQFTBBMBCAA9AhsDBQkSzAMABQsJ CAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJVzie5FRhoa3A6Ly9rZXlzLmdudXBnLm5ldAAKCRD0 B9sAYdXPQDcIB/9uNkbYEex1rHKz3mr12uxYMwLOOFY9fstP5aoVJQ1nWQVB6m2cfKGdcRe1 2/nFaHSNAzT0NnKz2MjhZVmcrpyd2Gp2QyISCfb1FbT82GMtXFj1wiHmPb3CixYmWGQUUh+I AvUqsevLA+WihgBUyaJq/vuDVM1/K9Un+w+Tz5vpeMidlIsTYhcsMhn0L9wlCjoucljvbDy/ 8C9L2DUdgi3XTa0ORKeflUhdL4gucWoAMrKX2nmPjBMKLgU7WLBc8AtV+84b9OWFML6NEyo4 4cP7cM/07VlJK53pqNg5cHtnWwjHcbpGkQvx6RUx6F1My3y52vM24rNUA3+ligVEgPYBuQEN BFXOJlcBCADAmcVUNTWT6yLWQHvxZ0o47KCP8OcLqD+67T0RCe6d0LP8GsWtrJdeDIQk+T+F xO7DolQPS6iQ6Ak2/lJaPX8L0BkEAiMuLCKFU6Bn3lFOkrQeKp3u05wCSV1iKnhg0UPji9V2 W5eNfy8F4ZQHpeGUGy+liGXlxqkeRVhLyevUqfU0WgNqAJpfhHSGpBgihUupmyUg7lfUPeRM DzAN1pIqoFuxnN+BRHdAecpsLcbR8sQddXmDg9BpSKozO/JyBmaS1RlquI8HERQoe6EynJhd 64aICHDfj61rp+/0jTIcevxIIAzW70IadoS/y3DVIkuhncgDBvGbF3aBtjrJVP+5ABEBAAGJ ASUEGAEIAA8FAlXOJlcCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ9AfbAGHVz0CbFwf9F/PXxQR9i4N0iipISYjU sxVdjJOM2TMut+ZZcQ6NSMvhZ0ogQxJ+iEQ5OjnIputKvPVd5U7WRh+4lF1lB/NQGrGZQ1ic alkj6ocscQyFwfib+xIe9w8TG1CVGkII7+TbS5pXHRxZH1niaRpoi/hYtgzkuOPp35jJyqT/ /ELbqQTDAWcqtJhzxKLE/ugcOMK520dJDeb6x2xVES+S5LXby0D4juZlvUj+1fwZu+7Io5+B bkhSVPb/QdOVTpnz7zWNyNw+OONo1aBUKkhq2UIByYXgORPFnbfMY7QWHcjpBVw9MgC4tGeF R4bv+1nAMMxKmb5VvQCExr0eFhJUAHAhVg== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:14:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19a3e738-795f-50a8-27a1-548c9ec5fbdc@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ii6887RjMhBcDDZXvNOI3B0lpKb1OMUs9" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:15:36 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v10 08/14] iotests: prepare 124 and 257 bitmap querying for backup-top filter X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "fam@euphon.net" , "kwolf@redhat.com" , Denis Lunev , "wencongyang2@huawei.com" , "xiechanglong.d@gmail.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "armbru@redhat.com" , "jsnow@redhat.com" , "stefanha@redhat.com" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ii6887RjMhBcDDZXvNOI3B0lpKb1OMUs9 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4JkQTQzf8oCD6X0MmMDxqMDVMJmXnznIb"; protected-headers="v1" From: Max Reitz To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , "qemu-block@nongnu.org" Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "eblake@redhat.com" , "armbru@redhat.com" , "xiechanglong.d@gmail.com" , "wencongyang2@huawei.com" , "fam@euphon.net" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "jsnow@redhat.com" , "kwolf@redhat.com" , Denis Lunev Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/14] iotests: prepare 124 and 257 bitmap querying for backup-top filter References: <20190830161228.54238-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20190830161228.54238-9-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <75066c81-04f5-b849-51a8-c663fea5b60b@redhat.com> <19a3e738-795f-50a8-27a1-548c9ec5fbdc@virtuozzo.com> In-Reply-To: <19a3e738-795f-50a8-27a1-548c9ec5fbdc@virtuozzo.com> --4JkQTQzf8oCD6X0MmMDxqMDVMJmXnznIb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09.09.19 15:49, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > 09.09.2019 16:25, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 30.08.19 18:12, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >>> After backup-top filter appearing it's not possible to see dirty >>> bitmaps in top node, so use node-name instead. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy >>> --- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 83 ++++---- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/257 | 49 ++--- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/257.out | 364 +++++++++++++------------------= --- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 27 +++ >>> 4 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-) >> >> [...] >> >>> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotes= ts.py >>> index 84438e837c..1906eb72f3 100644 >>> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py >>> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py >>> @@ -643,6 +643,33 @@ class VM(qtest.QEMUQtestMachine): >> >> [...] >> >>> + def check_bitmap_status(self, node_name, bitmap_name, fields): >>> + ret =3D self.get_bitmap(node_name, bitmap_name) >>> + >>> + return fields.items() <=3D ret.items() >> >> Why the <=3D? AFAIU, it will compare each of the arrays=E2=80=99 elem= ents one by >> one and return true if all of the ones in @fields are less than or equ= al >> to the ones in @ret. >=20 > No, it's a valid way to check that one dict is subdict of another, > as dict_view works like Set class: OK. It looked to me like .items() just returned an array. (When I googled for how <=3D behaves here.) [...] > Should I care about python2 now, or we already dropped its support in i= otests? We haven=E2=80=99t officially. OTOH, 4.2 is set to release on December 3= , which is less than one month before Python 2=E2=80=99s EOL. So it would be clo= se to wrong to care at this point, I guess? Reviewed-by: Max Reitz --4JkQTQzf8oCD6X0MmMDxqMDVMJmXnznIb-- --ii6887RjMhBcDDZXvNOI3B0lpKb1OMUs9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEkb62CjDbPohX0Rgp9AfbAGHVz0AFAl12XmMACgkQ9AfbAGHV z0Awlwf8CavsWW6CYWZ/fKS3NyGfeEB+DLLM49MzNV4VA3lfsRrwkoyKE7/pV40m iNhsUQNR698b4gM5ajKNm/ADlsLJeFB38cAQra0M9JmNtDVzroiV4cuD7mY+zYrf Oew09Uzv/2PBpXNicxqyvZuxg+AOvjDss1OAQOq9eghYm/bsDdTIMii+YO2nLlSY WSSTYRm0zdVMpFxEC0tGgqPRhVkYpyiI+vkwTV2AvovwLH8pDFhW9Q7B8OcvVhw6 j5SSX9nHMHNjgojSDmG3oFJALl4486Lf0uFR7wxmWMizJ9zYPuGMaN2k7dg5P6Jm 896wY/x4qvWLADZXvpoNhL1iW/H2Pw== =Z/WA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ii6887RjMhBcDDZXvNOI3B0lpKb1OMUs9--