From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FA9C43382 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800192087A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:45:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 800192087A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727366AbeIYLvQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:51:16 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0252.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.252]:53850 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725959AbeIYLvP (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:51:15 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546E7100E86C1; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:45:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: price76_2f030183bad1a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1633 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.153.53]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 104/105] IB/nes: Fix a compiler warning From: Joe Perches To: Sasha Levin Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Bart Van Assche , Jason Gunthorpe Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:45:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180924223952.GA9157@sasha-vm> References: <20180924113113.268650190@linuxfoundation.org> <20180924113123.002918395@linuxfoundation.org> <6f7ca3c205bada768c3918b1feacbbd5ce23a64d.camel@perches.com> <20180924175902.GB19402@kroah.com> <6d6f31c87b0c9b1a551d352439183c8c9c4df04c.camel@perches.com> <20180924223952.GA9157@sasha-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 22:39 +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > The reasoning behind it was similar to the "no warnings" reasoning of > upstream: there might be real issues hiding in the sea of "harmless" > warnings, so we want to get rid of all of them to catch real issues. I believe this to be a poor idea for -stable acceptance. It's impossible to know when gcc or any other compiler would decide to add any new warning.