From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FA2C4332F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 15:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231204AbiKDPFK (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:05:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50172 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232320AbiKDPFE (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2022 11:05:04 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F17EBE0E for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1667574296; x=1699110296; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RaXeA3lCHqq/I4+SahQVZ4hXUivbF7Ar5S6jFlTfNpc=; b=foU/OmiF/ylj4r6cJDuV3TjNcH0my2TsfnDMqj927jHZ2U4WrKpXU3+4 DdFea6du2SiOYR7bW/a0vVo+wkjhrwlY+H2jxHKEUuBuWQ/Aor0oW2IR9 eXIEqhvK6bwou/vtRpAAH6lt0fCFCqfY2f9x0KqQJX4uGc5iLjADS4zWH 4eQxjA1LKUuSE1hC1XsXGuXbPBAemE4wImKv6Wq9i23lBvMKWAOllJMi6 ByYBq3aigrLaENHb+/KFQ9si6aaRo3t9bW2IhFBe/KYjFNNxGwHNOWU4O /P1EoskOUMuuIi1gyoYB/WDrxhqgadqJcrMP4SUyfCQfso2wMRIKUi0R6 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="311106846" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,137,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="311106846" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2022 08:04:55 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10521"; a="777739712" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,137,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="777739712" Received: from anantsin-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.209.97.57]) ([10.209.97.57]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2022 08:04:54 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 08:04:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] x86: remove X86_FEATURE_XENPV usage in setup_cpu_entry_area() Content-Language: en-US To: Juergen Gross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org Cc: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" References: <20221104072701.20283-1-jgross@suse.com> <20221104072701.20283-5-jgross@suse.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20221104072701.20283-5-jgross@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/4/22 00:27, Juergen Gross wrote: > Testing of X86_FEATURE_XENPV in setup_cpu_entry_area() can be removed, > as this code path is 32-bit only, and Xen PV guests are not supporting > 32-bit mode. Acked-by: Dave Hansen