From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 38/51] IB/qib: Add qib_sysfs.c Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:29:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20091203190305.29507.58158.stgit@chromite.mv.qlogic.com> <20091203190624.29507.22110.stgit@chromite.mv.qlogic.com> <1270762193.2278.25.camel@chromite.mv.qlogic.com> <20100408151234.43f4bfc6.weiny2@llnl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100408151234.43f4bfc6.weiny2-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org> (Ira Weiny's message of "Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:12:34 -0700") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ira Weiny Cc: Ralph Campbell , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > I for one would rather not see this die. We have debugged some critical > issues using this data. The sysfs entries above are what Mellanox uses. > Should those also be changed? Which sysfs entries? I don't see any likely looking code in either of the Mellanox drivers. - R. -- Roland Dreier || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html