From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756596Ab0CXQkx (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:40:53 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:12146 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755960Ab0CXQkv (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:40:51 -0400 Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAPPdqUurR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACbHHOmf5kEhH4Egx4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,301,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="171636248" From: Roland Dreier To: Anton Starikov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <20100323180002.GA2965@elte.hu> <15090451-C292-44D6-B2BA-DCBCBEEF429D@gmail.com> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:40:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <15090451-C292-44D6-B2BA-DCBCBEEF429D@gmail.com> (Anton Starikov's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:03:36 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I will apply this commits to 2.6.32, I afraid current OFED (which I > need also) will not work on 2.6.33+. What do you need from OFED that is not in 2.6.34-rc1? -- Roland Dreier For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50A96B01EC for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:40:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <20100323180002.GA2965@elte.hu> <15090451-C292-44D6-B2BA-DCBCBEEF429D@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:40:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: <15090451-C292-44D6-B2BA-DCBCBEEF429D@gmail.com> (Anton Starikov's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:03:36 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Anton Starikov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra List-ID: > I will apply this commits to 2.6.32, I afraid current OFED (which I > need also) will not work on 2.6.33+. What do you need from OFED that is not in 2.6.34-rc1? -- Roland Dreier For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org