From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755876AbdKCQjM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:39:12 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:44770 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753880AbdKCQjL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 3 Nov 2017 12:39:11 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,339,1505804400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1239414661"
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v2 2/2] PM / QoS: Fix device resume latency framework
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>, Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@intel.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
References: <5770848.Kdi5IjVKeE@aspire.rjw.lan>
 <2520927.XkLgALY3I0@aspire.rjw.lan> <36826935.bDl2WuZxgq@aspire.rjw.lan>
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Message-ID: <aea02edb-b112-18db-6de5-f10e9a43846d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:39:08 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <36826935.bDl2WuZxgq@aspire.rjw.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Rafael,

I started to test this but found myself triggering one of the warnings:

On 11/3/2017 4:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -28,16 +28,19 @@ enum pm_qos_flags_status {
>  	PM_QOS_FLAGS_ALL,
>  };
>  
> -#define PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
> +#define PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE	(-1)

PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE is -1 ...


> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/qos.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ static int apply_constraint(struct dev_p
>  
>  	switch(req->type) {
>  	case DEV_PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY:
> +		if (WARN_ON(value < 0))
> +			value = 0;
> +

... causing me to hit this WARN_ON because apply_constraint() is called by __dev_pm_qos_remove_request() with the value parameter set to PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE.

Reinette