From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FCBC433DF for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABA37206C0 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ABA37206C0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=eik.bme.hu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpc9Z-0007uk-0Z for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:35:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpc8t-0007Eq-43; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:35:03 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]:28674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpc8r-0007b2-FK; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 14:35:02 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (blah.eik.bme.hu [152.66.115.182]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF2A74632C; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id A0C6A745712; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6587456F8; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:34:57 +0200 (CEST) From: BALATON Zoltan To: Mark Cave-Ayland Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Mac Old World ROM experiment In-Reply-To: <7e7de183-e453-0907-71ca-c1c8126e5543@ilande.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <7e7de183-e453-0907-71ca-c1c8126e5543@ilande.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (BSF 395 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=152.66.115.2; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/28 14:20:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = FreeBSD 9.x or newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Gibson , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Howard Spoelstra Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 26/06/2020 11:21, BALATON Zoltan wrote: >> What about these patches? At least those that are finished (up to patch 9) could be >> merged. I've seen you sent a pull request but not including any of these. Will this >> need another rebase after your patches? If I rebase them will you consider merging >> them? (Otherwise I won't spend time with it.) > > Ah sorry I missed the latest version of these. I'll take a quick look now. In case you missed that I've just sent the latest v6 version of the series with changes you've suggested and I made since. > (BTW it seems the patches in your patchset have started appearing in a random order > when sent to the list again?) I've noticed this too but don't know why that happens or what to do to prevent it. I submit these in one batch to my mail server which then seems to send it off simultaneously and may end up out of order. I've tried adding a 1 sec delay now but apparently that did not solve it. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, BALATON Zoltan