From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:16:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <7vr69r8sqk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vlk01hqzz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080718175040.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <20080718182010.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <7v63r38r4r.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vabge30dh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v4p6l3jbm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 20 01:16:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKLf7-0007a8-Lz for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:16:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753909AbYGSXP0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:15:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753959AbYGSXP0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:15:26 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47772 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753046AbYGSXPZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:15:25 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2008 23:15:23 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp060) with SMTP; 20 Jul 2008 01:15:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19yJuA9Jldyni6Ybj+9SSbowVODMjX0u3fRAvtHIj Mdmb01ql9BFxj0 X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <7v4p6l3jbm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > Yes, I agree, if all strategies fail, it is dubitable that we find a > > metric that will always find the "best" one. But if one fails and the > > next one does not, it is obvious what is correct. > > Not at all. Imagine the case where one of them is either ours or > theirs. But then it is not the _default_ at all! It is what the _user_ _asked_ for. So this is what the user gets. With Git, the user is not ignored (like GNOME does, to "help" the user). With Git, the user _gets_ what she asked for, even if the question does not make sense. Ciao, Dscho