From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LiSls-0000Z8-Vt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:15:21 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LiSln-0000XZ-4U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:15:19 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48083 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LiSlm-0000XW-VW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:15:15 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58050)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>) id 1LiSlm-0003QR-Cp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:15:14 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:16:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: SIGSEGV on Windows with KQEMU enabled
In-Reply-To: <gpe5da$4i1$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0903141315430.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
References: <gosfo1$575$1@ger.gmane.org> <49B1E13C.9060900@codemonkey.ws>
	<gpccsa$5gj$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<alpine.DEB.1.00.0903131133150.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
	<gpe5da$4i1$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Consul <void@aleksoft.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Consul wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > compiling with --std=c99?
> 
> with -std=c99 it does not even compile

... error message?

> > Alternatively, you might want to try to
> > 
> > #define snprintf __mingw_snprintf
> > #define vsnprintf __mingw_vsnprintf
> > 
> 
> These give linker undefined symbol errors.

... error message?

And further: do you use the TDM GCC4?

> But really funny think is the change that triggers the bug is precisely this:
> -Monitor *cur_mon;
> +Monitor *cur_mon = NULL;
> 
> Obviously, kqemu is happier having garbage in the cur_mon than NULL

I rather expect that to _hide_ the bug.  The "garbage" might be a 
left-over from the heap.

Ciao,
Dscho