From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:18:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <200904260703.31243.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <4d8e3fd30904260123r35b6a348uab3ad22fde9daa3f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Ciarrocchi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 26 13:20:32 2009 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ly1Sx-0003Bz-DN for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:20:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752130AbZDZKSe (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:18:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751663AbZDZKSe (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:18:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:44822 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751461AbZDZKSd (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:18:33 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2009 10:18:32 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO pacific.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 26 Apr 2009 12:18:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+rTOdON7urJFtz4874Ys0fByr+t/yjqFr3LMKf77 SgUTdBWYjGQiHz X-X-Sender: schindelin@pacific.mpi-cbg.de In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.59 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > On 4/26/09, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > The deciding feature (well, one of deciding features) was the fact > > > that Mercurial has better HTTP support... I guess (it was not obvious > > > from the analysis, but it was hinted at) that Mercurial uses its > > > custom protocol over HTTP, as opposed to "dumb" HTTP protocol support > > > in Git. > > > > > > Perhaps it is time to restart work on _"smart" HTTP protocol_? > > > > > > > > > wasn't Shawn working on it? > > GIVE HIM A BREAK! Sorry. While it reflects exactly what I felt reading your mail, I should have phrased it like this: Don't ask what Shawn can do for you. Ask what you can do for Shawn. Ciao, Dscho