From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:12:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20090511222702.352192505@arndb.de> <200905112238.55404.arnd@arndb.de> <20090512090602.65722342@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200905121123.21436.arnd@arndb.de> <20090513033027.GA13193@cynthia.pants.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-reply-to: <20090513033027.GA13193@cynthia.pants.nu> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Brad Boyer Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp Hi, > > Currently, the only architectures that don't set HAS_DMA are h8300, m32r > > m68k (except SUN3 and Coldfire), microblaze and s390. > > s390 will never get it, microblaze is currently implementing dma-mapping.h. > > > > The other three are still using drivers/ide instead of drivers/ata. > > > > One way to fix this would be to implement dma-mapping.h in h8300, m32r and > > m68k and leave !HAS_DMA as the obscure s390 case (this one already can't > > use ATA because of !HAS_MMIO). > > If I'm reading the m68k code correctly, SUN3 is the one that doesn't have > DMA. It is implemented on any m68k with a standard Motorola MMU. It might > be possible to get the DMA code working on a sun3, but I doubt they ever > have IDE hardware. The Atari IDE interface does not use DMA. I don't see what addition of DMA mapping for IDE would achieve. If it doesn't interfere with plain PIO mode, fine. Michael