From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] UTF helpers Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:14:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1242168631-30753-1-git-send-email-robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> <1242168631-30753-2-git-send-email-robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> <200905130724.44634.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Robin Rosenberg X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 13 12:14:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4BTc-000440-Dj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:14:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758260AbZEMKOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:14:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758198AbZEMKOF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:14:05 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:53323 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754956AbZEMKOD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 06:14:03 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 10:14:03 -0000 Received: from cbg-off-client.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO intel-tinevez-2-302.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.11.5] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 13 May 2009 12:14:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ffdJjhghfKfD49hYOq60Y14PrmpwNJazFroCdSO D9VEayODLlIDyL X-X-Sender: schindel@intel-tinevez-2-302 In-Reply-To: <200905130724.44634.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 13 May 2009, Robin Rosenberg wrote: > > Okay, I'll stop here. You might want to clean up your patch series > > before resending. > > I also told you why why I stopped working on the patches. The patches > are not part of a beauty contest and not meant for inclusion as such. If > you cannot see through the rubble, just ignore the patches. If the > conclusion is that this is a way forward, then I could start working on > a completely new set of much cleaner patches., You know, I really should have gone to bed, because I managed to mistake the "RFC" for "PATCH". Very sorry for that, Dscho