From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Cross-Platform Version Control Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <419AD153-53B4-4DAB-AF72-4127C17B1CA0@gmail.com> <4A0C77D9.5050402@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Peter Krefting , git@vger.kernel.org To: Esko Luontola X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 15 00:26:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4jMr-0007ec-0L for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 15 May 2009 00:25:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753558AbZENWZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 18:25:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753328AbZENWZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 18:25:23 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33438 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753016AbZENWZX (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2009 18:25:23 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2009 22:25:23 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO pacific.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 15 May 2009 00:25:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/JjVlZjjjJHQDRkoIVPMNHIZ9EL+z92qSUXlcjiO /0bAc02azWG9va X-X-Sender: schindelin@pacific.mpi-cbg.de In-Reply-To: <4A0C77D9.5050402@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 14 May 2009, Esko Luontola wrote: > Peter Krefting wrote on 14.5.2009 16:48: > > > The best way would be to define this in the Git core once and for all, > > and add support to it for all the platforms in the same go, instead of > > trying to hack around the issue whenever it pops up on the various > > platforms. > > +1 You might be enthusiastic about this cunning idea. However, if it costs me performance on Linux, and all the benefits go to Windows users, then I will remove this "solution" from my personal Git tree _right away_, and I'd expect a lot of other people, too. I repeat this just once more: if you add complexity, you'll have to have a compelling reason to do so. If there is no benefit for Linux users, why should they bear the cost? But as Andreas remarked, I sincerely think that there has been enough talk about the issue. It's time to see some patches, or to stop the discussion. Ciao, Dscho