From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:36:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <7vljgei7rs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vskal5c11.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100106191825.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <7vocl7yxef.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20100107200509.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <7vtyux3bx1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <32541b131001081216p27d7e29bu269755db895128@mail.gmail.com> <32541b131001081231x1b6ac8c1k30084e4abf8cc896@mail.gmail.com> <4B47BE13.7070509@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Sverre Rabbelier , Avery Pennarun , Junio C Hamano , Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: A Large Angry SCM X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 09 02:31:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NTQAN-0007hn-Rk for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:31:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753242Ab0AIBay (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:30:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752730Ab0AIBay (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:30:54 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39516 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752596Ab0AIBax (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:30:53 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jan 2010 01:30:52 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO pacific.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp039) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2010 02:30:52 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+2zwsYm7m2N4a+9e0q8Q7N6jp+o9RocJkOXslcw7 uI0IuGuEl2Xdas X-X-Sender: schindelin@pacific.mpi-cbg.de In-Reply-To: <4B47BE13.7070509@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, A Large Angry SCM wrote: > Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun > > wrote: > > > Thanks, I didn't know about that one. But my general point is > > > still: we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of > > > one is actually a superset of the other. As far as I can see, > > > anyway. So the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to > > > simply eliminate the less-featureful implementation. > > > > *cough* git sequencer *cough* > > *cough* not in my ${PATH} *cough* *cough* because that GSoC project failed in all but writing? *cough*