From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: support fetch with autocrlf on
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:59:00 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1002140055550.20986@pacific.mpi-cbg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40aa078e1002130616u478397c0xf757d5424630e6cf@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> I don't think it affects svn dcommit in any way, except from the
> implicit svn rebase that svn dcommit performs. d3c9634e sets
> core.autocrlf to "false" on init, but re-enabling it hasn't shown any
> problems in my end. I'm using git-svn with these patches and
> core.autocrlf enabled every day at my day-job.
To elicit a warm and fuzzy feeling about your patch, you will have to
analyze the code paaths of dcommit, and how crlf affects them. Then you
will have to describe why dcommit does not have a problem with crlf with
your patches anymore.
Remember, the idea of a commit message is to optimize the overall time
balance, i.e. avoid the many to perform what the one can do for them. And
since you have to do that analysis for yourself anyway, it makes sense to
write up the result in the commit message.
Thanks,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-13 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-12 17:52 [PATCH 1/2] hash-object: support --stdin-paths with --no-filters Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-12 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: support fetch with autocrlf on Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-13 12:25 ` Eric Wong
2010-02-13 14:16 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-13 23:59 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2010-02-14 0:27 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-14 0:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-14 1:04 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2010-02-13 23:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-12 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] hash-object: support --stdin-paths with --no-filters Dmitry Potapov
2010-02-14 13:42 ` Erik Faye-Lund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.1002140055550.20986@pacific.mpi-cbg.de \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kusmabite@googlemail.com \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.