From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: gcc inlining heuristics was Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:30:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20090111201427.GP26290@one.firstfloor.org> <1231704939.25018.548.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090111203441.GQ26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090112001255.GR26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090112005228.GS26290@one.firstfloor.org> <496B86B5.3090707@t-online.de> <20090112193201.GA23848@one.firstfloor.org> <496BBE27.2020206@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Bernd Schmidt , Andi Kleen , David Woodhouse , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Harvey Harrison , "H. Peter Anvin" , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich , jh@suse.cz To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > code tends to get a lot more I$ and D$ misses. Deep call-chains _will_ I feel like an idiot that I never realized that "I$" meant "instruction cache" until now :-p -- Steve