From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760656AbZFQUkI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:40:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752652AbZFQUj6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:39:58 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:24796 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750798AbZFQUj5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:39:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=b5+CZJg+wz/F0meBLW9R19JszbJBtH9nZlq12ifsyfUZRRlzIc6y2ydiqQWidSObO YNHPYsXbWv5sIgtVE6Aog== Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:39:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: Michael Tokarev cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Justin Piszcz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.29.1: nfsd: page allocation failure - nfsd or kernel problem? In-Reply-To: <4A395119.5060108@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Message-ID: References: <4A37FE48.6070306@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4A38ACC0.3060501@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4A38C7CA.7040005@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20090617185139.GF24040@fieldses.org> <4A395119.5060108@msgid.tls.msk.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13518 > > Does not look similar. > > I repeated the issue here. The slab which is growing here is buffer_head. > It's growing slowly -- right now, after ~5 minutes of constant writes over > nfs, its size is 428423 objects, growing at about 5000 objects/minute rate. > When stopping writing, the cache shrinks slowly back to an acceptable > size, probably when the data gets actually written to disk. > Not sure if you're referring to the bugzilla entry or Justin's reported issue. Justin's issue is actually allocating a skbuff_head_cache slab while the system is oom. > It looks like we need a bug entry for this :) > > I'll re-try 2.6.30 hopefully tomorrow. > You should get the same page allocation failure warning with 2.6.30. You may want to try my patch in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/17/437 which suppresses the warnings since, as you previously mentioned, there are no side effects and the failure is easily recoverable.