From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755254Ab0CCRiL (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:38:11 -0500 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:63723 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754969Ab0CCRiJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:38:09 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,574,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="9766529" Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:41:55 +0000 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball-desktop To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell , Sheng Yang , Keir Fraser , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Ian Pratt , xen-devel , "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/7] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization In-Reply-To: <4B8E9DD7.6020408@goop.org> Message-ID: References: <1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <1267436315-24486-4-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B8C63B0.2090507@goop.org> <201003020938.53630.sheng@linux.intel.com> <1267521735.11737.23107.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4B8D7248.5070807@goop.org> <4B8E9DD7.6020408@goop.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 03/03/2010 03:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Give a look at the fourth patch of the series I just posted: it > > introduces a simple driver for the Xen PCI platform device to initialize > > xenbus and gran table later on when running in a HVM domain, at the same > > time leaving the PV case as it is. > > > > Yes, I noticed that. Do the PV drivers cope with having the PCI > probe/xenbus setup after their init functions have been called, or do > you make sure the PCI probe happens early? > Nope, they seem to cope fine so far. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM initialization Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:41:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1267436315-24486-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <1267436315-24486-4-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <4B8C63B0.2090507@goop.org> <201003020938.53630.sheng@linux.intel.com> <1267521735.11737.23107.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4B8D7248.5070807@goop.org> <4B8E9DD7.6020408@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B8E9DD7.6020408@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Stefano Stabellini , "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Campbell , Ian Pratt , xen-devel , Keir Fraser , Sheng Yang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 03/03/2010 03:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Give a look at the fourth patch of the series I just posted: it > > introduces a simple driver for the Xen PCI platform device to initialize > > xenbus and gran table later on when running in a HVM domain, at the same > > time leaving the PV case as it is. > > > > Yes, I noticed that. Do the PV drivers cope with having the PCI > probe/xenbus setup after their init functions have been called, or do > you make sure the PCI probe happens early? > Nope, they seem to cope fine so far.