From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>
Cc: "Agarwal, Preshit" <preshit.agarwal@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pais, Allen" <allen.pais@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] Registering sgx device and it's platform data
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:39:39 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003310330470.14436@utopia.booyaka.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330094902.GG30597@nokia.com>
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:49:19AM +0200, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > I would suggest that you name this function be named something more
> > specific, such as omap_sgx_set_bus_tput(), since the SGX driver may also
> > need to set other PM constraints later, such as wakeup latency
> > constraints.
>
> then it could just add the contraints to the same function instead of passing
> another pointer to driver ??
It's hard to say without looking at the driver.
Bus throughput constraints are only needed when the device is actively
transferring data to/from the rest of the system.
Wakeup latency constraints are only needed when the device can go idle and
enter some low-power state, but also needs to be ready in some limited
amount of time to service an interrupt or a wakeup.
So, often it would make sense to set the two parameters at different
points in the driver code.
- Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 7:06 [PATCH v3 1/1] Registering sgx device and it's platform data Agarwal, Preshit
2010-03-30 8:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-30 8:49 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-03-30 9:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-03-31 9:39 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1003310330470.14436@utopia.booyaka.com \
--to=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=allen.pais@ti.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preshit.agarwal@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.