From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756031Ab0FHTFK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:05:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.35]:6076 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754925Ab0FHTFH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:05:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=xbeOouG9El5nmDCkfXhCTOKXRJ8VY+63QYHg/q9mmiIjbAJKsEVBxw2LNJG6IVXRv qpnDA7JGHSTaEyVNu/t1w== Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: KOSAKI Motohiro cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , LKML , linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin , Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset In-Reply-To: <20100608210148.7695.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100608204621.767A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100608210148.7695.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > From: David Rientjes > > Tasks that do not share the same set of allowed nodes with the task that > triggered the oom should not be considered as candidates for oom kill. > You're not a maintainer, as I obviously have to point out to you often enough. I've repeatedly asked you to work with me in reviewing my oom killer rewrite on linux-mm, yet you seldom offer any valuable feedback other than a simple "nack". I don't consider any of your patchset here to be more applicable than my patchset, which has been developed over the course of several months, and your lack of participation in the process is really quite shocking to me. In case nobody has told you before: Andrew maintains this code and these patches will be going through the -mm tree. You are not a maintainer of it (or any other kernel code), so please act within your role of kernel hacker and review patches as people propose them by offering your constructive feedback. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EB66B01DD for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.1]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o58J56EM020585 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:05:06 -0700 Received: from pvc21 (pvc21.prod.google.com [10.241.209.149]) by hpaq1.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o58J4x5s014598 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:05:04 -0700 Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so470507pvc.34 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset In-Reply-To: <20100608210148.7695.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100608204621.767A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100608210148.7695.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , LKML , linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin , Minchan Kim List-ID: On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > From: David Rientjes > > Tasks that do not share the same set of allowed nodes with the task that > triggered the oom should not be considered as candidates for oom kill. > You're not a maintainer, as I obviously have to point out to you often enough. I've repeatedly asked you to work with me in reviewing my oom killer rewrite on linux-mm, yet you seldom offer any valuable feedback other than a simple "nack". I don't consider any of your patchset here to be more applicable than my patchset, which has been developed over the course of several months, and your lack of participation in the process is really quite shocking to me. In case nobody has told you before: Andrew maintains this code and these patches will be going through the -mm tree. You are not a maintainer of it (or any other kernel code), so please act within your role of kernel hacker and review patches as people propose them by offering your constructive feedback. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org