From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756142Ab0FHTJ3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:09:29 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.35]:7808 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754925Ab0FHTJ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:09:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:x-x-sender:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=XcrxkTOEfSj3kC2HpfMbYHZRkOLYGX3rcQt6zRgpX0jc5RyHz/hr7TfOIluhz12SS zvdC+Gj62J0WhJexBZLGw== Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com To: KOSAKI Motohiro cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , LKML , linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin , Minchan Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] oom: rename badness() to oom_badness() In-Reply-To: <20100608205536.7683.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100608204621.767A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100608205536.7683.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > badness() is wrong name because it's too generic name. > > rename it. > This is already renamed in my heuristic rewrite which we all agree, in principle, is needed. I'm really confused that you're trying to take little bits and pieces of my work like this, using my name for the function in this case, for example, and not working with other developers in reviewing their work. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C326B01C4 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:09:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.97]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o58J9OYA018633 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:09:24 -0700 Received: from pwi4 (pwi4.prod.google.com [10.241.219.4]) by wpaz33.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o58J9MGv003779 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:09:23 -0700 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so316938pwi.1 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] oom: rename badness() to oom_badness() In-Reply-To: <20100608205536.7683.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: References: <20100608204621.767A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100608205536.7683.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" , LKML , linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Nick Piggin , Minchan Kim List-ID: On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > badness() is wrong name because it's too generic name. > > rename it. > This is already renamed in my heuristic rewrite which we all agree, in principle, is needed. I'm really confused that you're trying to take little bits and pieces of my work like this, using my name for the function in this case, for example, and not working with other developers in reviewing their work. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org