From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755047Ab0GALiY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 07:38:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:49498 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752569Ab0GALiX (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 07:38:23 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,519,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="690127" Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:38:37 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball-desktop To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Stefano Stabellini , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Don Dutile , Sheng Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen In-Reply-To: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com> Message-ID: References: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Hi all, > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of changes > > compared to the previous version follows: > > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I am > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not. > > And in this first intro email state: > > Since v7 the following things have changed: > - Konrad made some comments. > - etc. > Good point, I'll do that from now on. I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent.