From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753424Ab0GBKni (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:43:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com ([62.200.22.115]:4213 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752689Ab0GBKng (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:43:36 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,526,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="709394" Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 11:43:52 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@kaball-desktop To: Dan Magenheimer CC: Stefano Stabellini , Konrad Wilk , Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Jeremy@acsinet12.oracle.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Don Dutile , Sheng Yang Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen In-Reply-To: <1411749d-666c-447d-bf05-954e2b4adf93@default> Message-ID: References: <20100630175637.GC16488@phenom.dumpdata.com alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011111510.30135@kaball-desktop> <1411749d-666c-447d-bf05-954e2b4adf93@default> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > Hi Stefano -- > > What versions of Xen are compatible with this series? > I.e. is 4.0 required? Are all Xen-side changes in > official 4.0.0? Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore > will be in 4.0.1)? Or only in xen-unstable? > > If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point > out the changesets? > Any Xen version is going to work, but you need unstable to get all the features. In particular you need these patches: - 21647: implement HVMOP_pagetable_dying - 21493: update_runstate_area for 32 bit PV on HVM guests - 21449: implement vector callback for evtchn delivery - 21445: TSC handling cleanups (version 2) - 21341: Export timer hypercalls to HVM guests too - 21339: TSC handling cleanups