All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Etienne Martineau <etmartin101@gmail.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM devices assignment; PCIe AER?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 20:51:04 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010262001320.3242@ubuntu.ubuntu-domain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026230552.GA25455@sequoia.sous-sol.org>



On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Chris Wright wrote:

>> I would totally agree with you if the alternative implementation to
>> this legacy mode would be available in a relatively short time
>> frame. I'm not sure about that?
>
> Depends on how quickly you can help whip it into shape ;)

Humm, this is not an easy question;
IMHO the biggest problem of going with VFIO for devices assignment is 
interruption handling. VFIO knows how to signal an eventfd but doesn't 
know about 'kvm_set_irq' for example. I think that VFIO will require 
some adaptation for that matter.

Because qemu device assignment is working on VFIO I'm making the 
assumption that kvm iommu code can be entirely deprecated. Maybe I'm 
totally wrong here?

> That's why I asked about how you were implementing, for example, the AER
> extended capability exposure.  Capabilities are a problem for the current
> code (forget about extended capabilities, just regular capabilities).

We depend on Q35 PCIe chipset for that matter. Do this answer your 
question?

thanks,
Etienne


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-26 16:41 KVM devices assignment; PCIe AER? etmartin101
2010-10-26 18:10 ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-26 18:21 ` Chris Wright
2010-10-26 18:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 20:24   ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-26 20:42     ` Chris Wright
2010-10-26 22:08       ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-26 22:15         ` Chris Wright
2010-10-26 22:17           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 22:47           ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-26 23:05             ` Chris Wright
2010-10-27  3:51               ` Etienne Martineau [this message]
2010-10-27 14:54                 ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-27 18:23                   ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-27 19:16                     ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-27 21:43                       ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-27 22:58                         ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-28  4:58                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-28  5:17                             ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-28  5:39                               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-28 23:36                           ` Etienne Martineau
2010-10-26 20:54     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 18:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1010262001320.3242@ubuntu.ubuntu-domain \
    --to=etmartin101@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.