From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: RE: Xen 4.1 rc1 test report Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:01:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F2231C135DB@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F2231C135DB@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Cc: "Zheng, Shaohui" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > > > 5. [vt-d] fail to passthrou two or more devices to guest (Community) > > > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1710 > > > > Assigning multiple devices to an HVM guest using qemu should work, > > however assigning multiple devices to a PV guest or an HVM > > guest using stubdoms is known NOT to work. In particular this is what > > IanC is working on. > > > > Is this bug being reproduced using stubdoms? If so, this is a known > > issue, otherwise it might be a new bug. > > No, we don't use stubdoms. This also is a regression. Changeset 22653 didn't have this problem. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce this bug either. I have just successfully assigned two NICs to a VM, run dhclient and received proper IP addresses on both interfaces.