From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mikael Abrahamsson Subject: Re: wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 15:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20110506071752.GA22063@www2.open-std.org> <20110506133159.30c66519@natsu> <20110506090345.GA22245@www2.open-std.org> <4DC3BDD9.1060300@abpni.co.uk> <20110506094102.GC22245@www2.open-std.org> <20110506155059.6f82cbeb@natsu> <20110506123336.GC22617@www2.open-std.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-1932789980-1304688412=:20305" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110506123336.GC22617@www2.open-std.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Keld_J=F8rn_Simonsen?= Cc: Roman Mamedov , Jonathan Tripathy , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---137064504-1932789980-1304688412=:20305 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 6 May 2011, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > I am proposing that we call our raid10 layout types for RAID1 - in > accordance with SNIA standards, and in accordance with the common > understanding as demonstrated by you and others, even here on the > linux-raid kernel mailing list. Just so we're clear, if I create a raid1 with 4 drives I want 4 identical copies of the same information, not RAID1+0. How should this be handled with your suggestion? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se ---137064504-1932789980-1304688412=:20305--