From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jozsef Kadlecsik Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Possible problems found by static analysis of code Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:40:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1307712362-17727-1-git-send-email-jpopelka@redhat.com> <4DF24093.9090900@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jiri Popelka , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from smtp2.kfki.hu ([148.6.0.28]:33427 "EHLO smtp2.kfki.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757375Ab1FKNkD (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:40:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4DF24093.9090900@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On 10/06/11 15:25, Jiri Popelka wrote: > > We had analyzed the iptables-1.4.10 code with Coverity. > > Coverity is commercial enterprise level tool for > > static analysis (analysis based only on compiling of sources, > > not based on running of binary) of the code. > > it would be cool if you pass that tool to the conntrack-tools and ipset. Yes, I second that. Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@mail.kfki.hu PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary