From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce
 libxl__device_generic_add_t
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 13:03:15 +0100
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204031302590.15151@kaball-desktop>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203271453390.15151@kaball-desktop>
	<1332856772-30292-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
	<20337.61376.319377.655549@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1203301144510.15151@kaball-desktop>
	<20345.53580.464371.690500@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20345.53580.464371.690500@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/6] libxl: introduce libxl__device_generic_add_t"):
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Can we avoid introducing more of these transaction loops using goto ?
> > 
> > I am afraid I actually prefer the simple goto scheme than the convoluted
> > code below.
> 
> I really can't stomach any more of these gotos.  If you don't want to
> abstract it away, can't you at least write the loop as a loop with
> for() or while() ?

Yes, I can do that.