From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:64969 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993906AbdGDPgLqAHz7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:36:11 +0200 Received: from HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (unknown [10.100.10.19]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 98905869887B5; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:36:02 +0100 (IST) Received: from [10.20.78.88] (10.20.78.88) by HHMAIL01.hh.imgtec.org (10.100.10.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:36:05 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:35:51 +0100 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: James Hogan CC: Ralf Baechle , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] MIPS16e2: Report ASE presence in /proc/cpuinfo In-Reply-To: <20170703202323.GM31455@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Message-ID: References: <20170703202323.GM31455@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [10.20.78.88] Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 59016 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: macro@imgtec.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, James Hogan wrote: > > Submitted third in the series so that the presence of "mips16e2" in > > /proc/cpuinfo not only indicates the hardware feature, but our correct > > unaligned emulation as well. > > This should be mentioned in the commit description (not the 3rd in the > series bit, the "it indicates both the hw feature and unaligned > emulation" bit). Shall I repost the series with this piece amended? Or will just 3/4 do? Maciej From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:64969 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993906AbdGDPgLqAHz7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:36:11 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:35:51 +0100 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] MIPS16e2: Report ASE presence in /proc/cpuinfo In-Reply-To: <20170703202323.GM31455@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> Message-ID: References: <20170703202323.GM31455@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: James Hogan Cc: Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Message-ID: <20170704153551.vilBMD8v_l-P-BUfSSJyuOYZp9miKBTZh7sBuuMn_eA@z> On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, James Hogan wrote: > > Submitted third in the series so that the presence of "mips16e2" in > > /proc/cpuinfo not only indicates the hardware feature, but our correct > > unaligned emulation as well. > > This should be mentioned in the commit description (not the 3rd in the > series bit, the "it indicates both the hw feature and unaligned > emulation" bit). Shall I repost the series with this piece amended? Or will just 3/4 do? Maciej