From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a separate process Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:40:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1339761246-27641-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1339761246-27641-1-git-send-email-ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is v4 of my series to asyncify save/restore. All comments have > been addressed. > > I have retested this with HVM (RHEL) and PV guests, for both localhost > migration and save/restore. RHEL seems to have some unreliability > which occurs with the baseline too. I was not able to test stub dms > at all because when trying to boot my RHEL guest with a stub dm the dm > domain immediately crashed. IanC, didn't you test xen-unstable with stubdoms not too long ago? In any case we should probably add "working stubdoms" to the blocker list.