From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-xen:Correctly expose PCH ISA bridge
 for IGD passthrough
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:49:07 +0000
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302251248100.5360@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
References: <CAKhsbWbezhvrAV=a=tvJmWosfeN0xsPb74sjqB6J9JViv2F7BQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20775.45924.670290.551847@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<512B46A402000078000C0B3B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<20779.18914.422564.346844@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<512B591702000078000C0BCE@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <512B591702000078000C0BCE@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, "G.R." <firemeteor@users.sourceforge.net>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.02.13 at 12:24, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-xen:Correctly expose PCH 
> > ISA bridge for IGD passthrough"):
> >> > Applied, thanks.  I fixed up some wrap damage.
> >> 
> >> Which means that my pointing out of shortcomings in this patch
> >> got completely ignored - we can only hope that this won't bite us
> >> later...
> > 
> > Sorry about that, perhaps I didn't spot the thread.  Do you think it
> > should be reverted ?
> 
> I'd prefer if you did so, and wait for a cleaned up version of the
> patch to be submitted. If you leave in what's there right now, I
> would b afraid that we'd never get to see a fixup patch on top.

You are talking about 5114F15002000078000BD2B2@nat28.tlf.novell.com?
G.R., can you work on this patch a bit more and address Jan's comments?
It shouldn't take long..