From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933872Ab3GEPPL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:15:11 -0400
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:45675 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757377Ab3GEPPJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:15:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Yet more softlockups.
In-Reply-To: <20130705143821.GB325@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307051710070.32106@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
References: <20130704015525.GA8486@redhat.com> <CA+55aFykwkTVtZuoCEvwpF+5q1LUscw1shkWNPtGdHu+1DgDJA@mail.gmail.com> <20130705143821.GB325@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, Dave Jones wrote:

> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 23s! [trinity-child1:14565]
> perf samples too long (2519 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
> INFO: NMI handler (perf_event_nmi_handler) took too long to run: 238147.002 msecs

So we see a softlockup of 23 seconds and the perf_event_nmi_handler
claims it did run 23.8 seconds.

Are there more instances of NMI handler messages ?

Thanks,

	tglx